A Message to Garcia. story Review free essay sample

Through hostile territory Rowan traveled by foot, within three weeks he delivered the letter to Garcia. In this story it was clear that he couldn’t express the things Rowan did to deliver this message, it was something incredible and not anything to boast about freely. The point the tried to make was that Rowan was given a task in which he asked no questions, he just did as he was told. The writer gave his opinion of what this meant to him. He said men don’t need to be book smart nor have a lot of knowledge on this subject but rather some courage, loyalty and trust. These things with some concentration are what it means to â€Å"carry a message†. I believe he’s saying it takes a man with no fear or hesitation to get the job done. At this point in the story General Garcia is now dead. We will write a custom essay sample on A Message to Garcia. story Review or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The writer states this isn’t where it stops, there are many other Garcias.. Meaning story’s like this one. He says no man will succeed by being foolish or only working half hearted, he believes you will get out of the situation what you put in to it and if you don’t have heart for what your trying to accomplish.. your not going to be successful. Elbert Hubbard the writer of this story puts another example in to perspective for the audience to think about. He talks about six clerks, he puts one to the test. He has asks the clerk to look in the encyclopedia and make a short memorandum explaining life of Corregio. He goes on to explain, the clerk most likely will not know what he is talking about and the clerk will end up asking all sorts of questions trying to get more information on this subject. When the clerk runs out of questions he will resort to another clerk and task him to help complete this mission, but all in the end the clerk will come back to him stating there is no such man named Corregio. The point the trys to make is that by asking the clerk to do this for him rather than do it himself is stupid. He says â€Å"if men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all? † Hes basically saying that a lazy man who has no independence and takes no responsibility in a situation is a selfish person. In this story Elbert Hubbard makes the point that a man doesn’t need to know how to spell or puncuate, or he may not have a good memory or grammar. A man may be great at one thing and horrible at another. It doesn’t matter those small things, what matters is if a man has the courage, responsibility, loyalty, pride and determination. A unique mindset of someone who could be given any random task and any given time and ask no questions. Without hesitation, completing the task with a full heart and a focused mindset†¦ this is what it means to â€Å"carry a message to Garcia† I like this story a lot because it relates to a lot of real life situations now. This story states a strong and bold message about morals and having self pride in what you do on a daily basis.

The art essayEssay Writing Service

The art essayEssay Writing Service The art essay The art essayArt comprises an integral part of the social life and people often appreciate art but often they are not even aware of the fact that they are dealing with art, for example, as they watch a print ad, which can be a form of art, but the audience perceives it just like the ad. On the other hand, artists perceive their art as a form of the communication with the audience. They try to convey their ideas to the audience by means of their creative work. In such a situation, the possibility of influencing the audience emerges.   However, art does not have as overwhelming impact as one may expect it has. On the contrary, art may remain misunderstood, if the audience does not understand the form and message the artist wants to convey to the audience. Therefore, it is a widely-spread misconception that art can change society through genius works of art, which make the audience to change their worldview, for example. What is more important, art, being unable to change the audience consistently, has to adapt to the audience’s needs and wants that, although, may cause the degradation of art. In fact, the impossibility of the art strike leads to the amateurization of art, when artists, being unable to change the public consciousness try to adapt to dominant cultural trends, even though they degrade the high art.The artistic avant-garde has always been associated with a radical attempt to transform society politically through formal and social interventions into art and its institutions (Saloman, 2014, 1). Artists attempted to convey their ideas to the public and make people changing their worldview. In fact, it seems to be the natural intention of an artist to share his/her ideas with the audience and make the audience following him/her. â€Å"Avant-garde† artists were the most progressive mainly because they have more progressive ideas and, therefore, they expected to change society by means of their art, which could have changed views and belief s of people but they have failed to reach the mass effect.Artistic interventions have at times modeled themselves after political formations from other spheres in an attempt to reproduce similar structural reforms and to forge alliances between artists and other groups of radicalized subjects (Saloman, 2014, 1). For example, the rise of the modernism on the turn of the centuries was driven by the turbulent epoch, when revolutions and wars affected many nations. In such a situation, artists naturally attempted to share their ideas with the audience and some of them believed that they could offer the audience ideas and values that could change the life of society. However, the radicalization of art is different from radicalization of ideas or society because radicalization of art leads to the misunderstanding of such art by the audience.As attempts of artists to change society have failed, they have started to change their art and, thus, the art has started considerable changes, espec ially since the mid-20th century. The high art undergoes the transformation, which Sholette compares to the fall of the high art down to amateur art, when the art acquires the status of a hobby. Sholelte also points out that among the fallen artists are those who sought to represent working class life with compassion and candor as well as more cerebrally oriented practitioners who endeavored to reveal and subvert the ideological tropes of mass culture (Sholette, 2). The downshift of the high art to the hobby art is the process of amateurization of art, where artists refuse from the use of the high art, which is incomprehensible for the mass audience and not interesting for the average viewer. Instead, they try to create new, unexpected forms of art and approaches that catch the attention of viewers and help artists to convey their ideas to the audience more clearly.The amateurization of art implies the widening gap between the high art and popular art, because the amateurized art is closer to the average people and more comprehensible to them. Therefore, the question that begs refers to the major drivers of such a change because it is unclear why artists agree to shift their art down from the high art, as the ultimate artistic form of the superior manifestation of artist’s vision, ideas and beliefs by means of an artistic form, to the amateurized art, which is intentionally simplified but closer to the audience. In this regard, the answer is the target audience of artists and the change of the target audience. As Saloman justly noticed the art strike is immensely impossible because the audience does not perceive art, especially in its complicated forms, as a powerful social movement. The audience is not willing to study the art so profoundly that the average viewers could understand the most complicated artistic forms. Instead, the audience is looking for simple, comprehensible but interesting art forms and works. This is why amateurization of art becom es so popular because artists can use unusual but interesting artistic forms to convey their messages to the audience in a simplified but still artistic way.At the same time, the current trend to the amateurization of art is actually the result of profound socio-cultural changes in the modern society because people have shifted from the appreciation of the high art, which was virtually a norm a century ago, for example, to the appreciation of art as a mere form of entertainment with the focus on the amateurized art, which is more amusing compared to high art and comprehensible for the general public. Today, art have become closer to the public but it has ceased to be the high art.Therefore, artists change and adapt their art respectively to the audience’s needs and wants, instead of changing the public. In such a context, Saloman’s idea of the impossibility of the art strikes proves to be right but such impossibility inevitably least to the degradation of art and its a mateurization or simplification to match the target audience knowledge, background, expectations and needs. In fact, what makes the high art different from the amateurized art and art that turns out to be submissive to the audience’s wants and needs is that the high art should have the power to change the public, instead of changing itself. However, today, there is little room for high art, while the public grows more and more accustomed to amateurization of art and its simplification.

The internment of Japanese-, German- and Italian-Americans during Research Paper

The internment of Japanese-, German- and Italian-Americans during World War II - Research Paper Example This internment was authorized by President Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 under the Executive Order 9066. The wartime incarceration of the Japanese Americans was the biggest mistake made by the Americans which they can only regret by erecting memorial such as that in the national Capitol which reminds them of the 120,000 Japanese American kept in the concentration camp and 26,000 who served in the US army during World War II or by doing extensive and exhaustive research so as to prove their guilt for the action1. The World War II brought with it a series of actions and events which affected Japanese Americans in many ways. The attack on Pearl Harbor along with the overpowering Japanese offensive through the Pacific as well as the Southeast Asia was a stun to the American military leaders as well as the civilian leaders. The US Navy had long realized that the Japan was the most expected enemy since its defeat of the Czarist Russia in 1905. As a result the American intelligence agenci es had made a pre-war plan to ensure the interning of certain enemy â€Å"aliens†.2 Daniels clearly states that the internment of the Japanese American was merely a â€Å"lawless exercise of power by the executive branch† although both the Congress and the Supreme Court gave an absolution for the action. He also draws a distinction between internment and incarceration; since the notion that the Japanese American citizens were treated like members of the Holocaust in â€Å"concentration camps† was considered an abuse to them it was referred by the Americans as â€Å"Assembly Centers† or â€Å"Relocation Centers†. This shows how the treatment of the Japanese Americans was packed with euphemisms.3 It is also been observed by researchers such as Schidkraut that the impact of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001 has revived the American national consciousness with regard to the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. This compels one to deeply investigate into the role of American identity in response to the terrorist attacks which have taken place so far. US population underwent an ethnic makeup in real and dramatic scenarios which occurred quite rapidly during World Wars. This led to a change in sentiments of the natives during the mid 1990s. The role of media during the World War II was severe and extremely brutal in terms of American national consciousness. This was evident by the following piece of information recollected by Schidkraut, â€Å"During WWII, media commentators said we need not worry that bombing cities in Japan might kill innocent civilians because there was no such thing as an innocent Japanese civilian.†4 Studying from the perspective of the Japanese-American and what they went through when they learnt of this incarceration, several researches reveal how hard it was for the Japanese Americans to pack their bags and leave the comfort of their homes to a seclusion which had no prescribed limit. At first they were taken to the Assembly Centers from where they were to be moved to the relocation centers. For others it was known as either the internment or to be kept in the concentration camps. This was the beginning of the loss of freedom for the Japanese Americans. The Americans started to marginalize any outsider or immigrant from any other country including Japan. They called such people aliens. Those aliens who entered the US legally were eligible to apply for citizenship later